球探网篮球彩票投注

Your present location: Taihai.net >> News Center >> Tianxia >> Domestic >> Text

Social commentary: Li Wei was pierced by Beijing, Washington should reflect

0936job.com 用手持设备访问 Source: Global Times Access with Handheld Device
QR code

Washington probably had a hope that Beijing, like Tokyo, Seoul, or Ottawa, would pray for the United States to waive its steel and aluminum tariffs and accept the harsh conditions proposed by the United States. However, Beijing has proactively announced reciprocal retaliation measures, resolutely firing the "first shot" to resist US trade pressure.

Then Washington was awkward. If it really implements the plan for large-scale taxation of Chinese goods announced in accordance with the 301 survey, there will be no suspense for Beijing to carry out further retaliation, and the trade war will officially begin. But the trade war is not what Washington really wants. The Trump administration hopes to scare China with the stick of the trade war.

Intimidation didn't help, and it signaled that Washington's first goal was missed and it was a bad start. Washington now wants to "make a fortune" to the international community, but it has chosen the wrong object and placed the wrong bet.

Not only the White House today, the American elite as a whole has overestimated US power and action. Some people even think that the United States is omnipotent. This US trade war with China contains the taste of "containment of China". Such an impulse is said to have certain universality among the American political elite.

However, they have overlooked a basic fact that China is already very strong and already another economic center of the world. Its market size and attractiveness are no less than that of the United States today. In addition, China's political and economic resistance to pressure is extraordinary. In order to win China as a "city", the United States needs to fight a "street fight" that is unimaginably brutal.

Even if some American elites prefer to stop China's rise as the primary goal and pay the price of economic and social development, the American people will certainly not follow suit. Because China's rise was achieved in a peaceful and legal manner, and there was no strategic provocation against the United States. For the American people, the benefits of normal cooperation with China far outweigh the benefits of confrontation with China. China is not an expander. It is too risky to coerce a moderate nuclear power and economic power.

In short, the United States cannot reshape the hegemony imagined by the Washington elite. Globalization and the democratization of international relations have eroded the basis of that hegemony. The United States today lacks neither the power required for that hegemony nor the corresponding will and domestic unity. Today the United States has difficulty even subduing Iran and North Korea, and it is even less likely that a big country like China will yield to it.

Washington can no longer rule the world in an empire way, and its imperial roar is often a bluff lacking real determination. The United States can generally make no one in the world dare to provoke it, but it is impossible for all countries to listen to it and let countries put American interests above their own interests.

The United States needs to fully accept the possibility of China's peaceful rise, as long as this rise is premised on acceptance of the existing international rule system. If some elites in the United States are psychologically unwilling to accept China's national policy of infiltrating the United States, they will put the United States in an unprecedented struggle.

Creating a new strategic space for the United States by subduing or destroying China sounds quite logical. In fact, this is fantasizing. Unless the uncomfortable level of peaceful coexistence with China is intolerable, actively colliding with China's strategy will not be a truly happy choice for American society. It's easy to say a few hard words, but in practice, no American president can provide the people with solid and credible reasons.

The United States is a pluralistic society, and Washington's elites should not overestimate their ability to lead their people to make strategic choices that take risks. Nor should they deceive themselves and overestimate their true willingness to bear all the consequences to curb China's rise.

Original title: Social commentary: Levy was pierced by Beijing, Washington should reflect

Original link: http://opinion.huanqiu.com/editorial/2018-04/11766841.html

related news
Social commentary: Washington has "infringement of intellectual property" delusion

One of the focal points of the Sino-US trade dispute is that the United States has accused China of infringing intellectual property rights. The United States preaches that China "steals" American technology through its western system of public opinion, and creates the impression that China's modernization is "stealing". This is actually a big lie. In the early days of China's reform and opening up, there were indeed some cases of disrespect for intellectual property rights. The most typical example was that some people semi-publicly manufactured and sold goods that were counterfeit foreign brands, as well as pirated audiovisual products. But as we all know, this kind of present ...

People's Daily Commentary on Sino-US Trade Friction: US Must Responsible for Irrational Recklessness

The United States must be held responsible for irrational reckless actions (bells) The U.S. wave of protectionist sticks starts from the purpose of harming others, and will eventually end in harm's way. On March 22, local time, signed by US President Trump The presidential memorandum, based on the results of the so-called 301 survey, imposed large-scale tariffs on goods imported from China and restricted Chinese companies' investment in the United States. The United States ignores the fact that China has strengthened the protection of intellectual property rights, disregards the rules of the World Trade Organization, and ignores the voice of the broad industry.

People's Daily: Washington responsible for all consequences of trade war

On March 22 local time, US President Trump signed a presidential memorandum, levying large-scale tariffs on goods imported from China and restricting Chinese companies' investment in the United States based on the results of the so-called "301 survey." The United States ignores the fact that China has strengthened the protection of intellectual property rights, ignores the rules of the World Trade Organization, and ignores the voices of the broad industry. It insists on adopting a typical unilateral and protectionist approach. The recovery and growth of the world economy has been opposed by the international community. ...

U.S. military parade guideline: only wheeled vehicles, no tanks

No tank? U.S. Department of Defense releases guidelines on US Department of Defense issued a memorandum on the 9th, setting out basic guidelines for President Donald Trump's long-awaited "parade parade," such as when to hold them and not using tanks. Subsequently, the Joint Chiefs of Staff will plan specific details of the military parade, which will eventually be executed by the North Command. The picture shows Macron (second from left) and Trump in working talks at the Elysee Palace. China News Agency reporter Long Jian Wu She decided! Without the Associated Press report, US Secretary of Defense James Mattis did ...

Why is there no tank for Trump's long-awaited "parade" policy?

Trump's long-awaited "parade" policy unveiled? The U.S. Department of Defense issued a memorandum on the 9th, setting out basic guidelines for President Donald Trump's long-awaited "parade," such as when to hold it and not using tanks. Subsequently, the Joint Chiefs of Staff will plan specific details of the military parade, which will eventually be executed by the North Command. On the evening of January 30th local time, US President Trump ...